NOMO vs DIARHEA

NOMO (NOMO) and DIARHEA (DIARHEA) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, DIARHEA is ahead by 17.8 percentage points (NOMO -99.3% against DIARHEA -81.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.03 across 34 shared trading days). NOMO has been the more volatile of the two, at 4712% annualised against DIARHEA's 374%.

Correlation: -0.03
Ahead over 30 days: DIARHEA

NOMONOMO

$8.768e-6

24h: -2.79%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $7
Volatility (ann.): 4712%

DIARHEADIARHEA

$4.130e-5

24h: -16.57%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $999
Volatility (ann.): 374%

Performance

NOMODIARHEA

7 days-20.94%-59.42%NOMO
30 days-99.30%-81.54%DIARHEA

Correlation

-0.03over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	NOMO	DIARHEA
Max drawdown (400d)	-99.5%	-93.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.02	-0.24

Relative strength over 90 days: DIARHEA outperformed NOMO by 93.5% — measured on the NOMO/DIARHEA ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

NOMO →DIARHEA →