BTC$75,741.09▼ 6.11%ETH$2,232.74▼ 8.15%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.03%BNB$693.16▼ 3.30%XRP$1.21▼ 8.14%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.55▼ 7.13%TRX$0.3187▼ 0.34%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.02%ZEC$1,281.00▼ 3.28%HYPE$78.05▼ 6.96%XMR$118.70▼ 2.94%DOGE$0.0718▼ 6.94%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$72.82▼ 6.66%LEO$9.35▼ 0.05%LINK$10.78▼ 6.96%ADA$0.1842▼ 6.99%BCH$276.30▼ 2.41%XLM$0.1545▼ 8.17%NEAR$3.69▼ 9.12%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%RAIN$0.006099▲ 2.65%UNI$6.93▼ 9.83%LTC$52.67▼ 6.18%CC$0.0969▼ 6.60%AVAX$8.30▼ 5.74%USD1$0.9995▼ 0.02%SUI$0.8576▼ 8.06%XAUT$4,035.51▼ 2.19%GRAM$1.10▼ 5.87%HBAR$0.0683▼ 6.54%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$190.95▼ 7.39%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.64%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.50▼ 6.61%CRO$0.0492▼ 5.93%BTC$75,741.09▼ 6.11%ETH$2,232.74▼ 8.15%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.03%BNB$693.16▼ 3.30%XRP$1.21▼ 8.14%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.55▼ 7.13%TRX$0.3187▼ 0.34%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.02%ZEC$1,281.00▼ 3.28%HYPE$78.05▼ 6.96%XMR$118.70▼ 2.94%DOGE$0.0718▼ 6.94%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$72.82▼ 6.66%LEO$9.35▼ 0.05%LINK$10.78▼ 6.96%ADA$0.1842▼ 6.99%BCH$276.30▼ 2.41%XLM$0.1545▼ 8.17%NEAR$3.69▼ 9.12%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▼ 0.01%RAIN$0.006099▲ 2.65%UNI$6.93▼ 9.83%LTC$52.67▼ 6.18%CC$0.0969▼ 6.60%AVAX$8.30▼ 5.74%USD1$0.9995▼ 0.02%SUI$0.8576▼ 8.06%XAUT$4,035.51▼ 2.19%GRAM$1.10▼ 5.87%HBAR$0.0683▼ 6.54%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$190.95▼ 7.39%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.64%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$220.50▼ 6.61%CRO$0.0492▼ 5.93%

Noooomeme vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 7179.9× the size of Noooomeme (NOOOO) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.47 across 117 shared trading days). NOOOO has been the more volatile of the two, at 148% annualised against WIF's 105%.

Correlation
0.47
Size ratio
1 : 7179.9
NoooomemeNOOOO

$2.305e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$23,003
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
148%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.165500

24h
-4.72%
Market cap
$165.16M
Volume 24h
$32.24M
Volatility (ann.)
105%
NOOOO 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

NOOOOWIF

  1. 7 days-31.76%-2.82%WIF
  2. 30 days-9.94%-34.09%NOOOO
  3. 90 days-90.93%+17.59%WIF
  4. 1 year—-62.97%—

Correlation

0.47over 117 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6990d: 0.481y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNOOOOWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-96.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.580.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed NOOOO by 72.4% — measured on the NOOOO/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.