BTC$76,006.01▼ 5.84%ETH$2,235.30▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$689.18▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.28▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,278.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$77.05▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0711▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.68▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1808▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1527▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.82▼ 11.13%LTC$51.62▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.16▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9992▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8395▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,076.32▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0675▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.50▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%BTC$76,006.01▼ 5.84%ETH$2,235.30▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$689.18▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.28▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,278.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$77.05▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0711▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.68▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1808▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1527▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.82▼ 11.13%LTC$51.62▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.16▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9992▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8395▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,076.32▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0675▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.50▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%

NORUGGIES vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 4928.8× the size of NORUGGIES (NORUGGIES) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.21 across 182 shared trading days). NORUGGIES has been the more volatile of the two, at 234% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.21
Size ratio
1 : 4928.8
NORUGGIESNORUGGIES

$3.294e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$32,774
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
234%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.161400

24h
-6.52%
Market cap
$161.54M
Volume 24h
$30.41M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
NORUGGIES 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

NORUGGIESWIF

  1. 7 days+23.02%-7.39%NORUGGIES
  2. 30 days+5.50%-32.13%NORUGGIES
  3. 90 days-82.59%+21.70%WIF
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.21over 182 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7490d: 0.411y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNORUGGIESWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-96.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.540.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed NORUGGIES by 88.5% — measured on the NORUGGIES/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.