Not In Labor Force vs Cash Cat

Cash Cat (CASHCAT) is 220.4× the size of Not In Labor Force (NILF) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, NILF is ahead by 55.5 percentage points (NILF +20.2% against CASHCAT -35.3%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.28 across 22 shared trading days). NILF has been the more volatile of the two, at 488% annualised against CASHCAT's 264%.

Correlation: 0.28
Size ratio: 1 : 220.4
Ahead over 30 days: NILF

Not In Labor ForceNILF

$0.000542

24h: -5.22%
Market cap: $483,671
Volume 24h: $6,727
Volatility (ann.): 488%

Cash CatCASHCAT

$0.107846

24h: -0.43%
Market cap: $106.59M
Volume 24h: $16.39M
Volatility (ann.): 264%

NILF 0.5%Share of the two combined market caps99.5% CASHCAT

Performance

NILFCASHCAT

7 days+123.38%+8.81%NILF
30 days+20.23%-35.26%NILF

Correlation

0.28over 22 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	NILF	CASHCAT
Max drawdown (400d)	-70.1%	-69.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.07	-0.02

Relative strength over 90 days: NILF outperformed CASHCAT by 85.8% — measured on the NILF/CASHCAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Not In Labor Force →Cash Cat →