BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%

NotWifGary vs Shiba Inu

Shiba Inu (SHIB) is 72830.9× the size of NotWifGary (NWG) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.58 across 72 shared trading days). NWG has been the more volatile of the two, at 153% annualised against SHIB's 69%.

Correlation
0.58
Size ratio
1 : 72830.9
NotWifGaryNWG

$5.278e-7

24h
—
Market cap
$36,415
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
153%
Shiba InuSHIB

$4.510e-6

24h
-5.35%
Market cap
$2.65B
Volume 24h
$64.65M
Volatility (ann.)
69%
NWG 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% SHIB

Performance

NWGSHIB

  1. 7 days+68.99%-4.83%NWG
  2. 30 days+15.88%-19.56%NWG
  3. 90 days—+1.07%—
  4. 1 year—-46.55%—

Correlation

0.58over 72 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricNWGSHIB
Max drawdown (400d)-72.6%-68.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.350.01
Best 30 days (past year)—+39.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-38.4%

Relative strength over 90 days: NWG outperformed SHIB by 1.4% — measured on the NWG/SHIB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.