Nullmask vs Monero

Monero (XMR) is 1692.0× the size of Nullmask (MASK) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, XMR is ahead by 46.8 percentage points (MASK -42.7% against XMR +4.1%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.08 across 36 shared trading days). MASK has been the more volatile of the two, at 401% annualised against XMR's 41%.

Correlation: 0.08
Size ratio: 1 : 1692.0
Ahead over 30 days: XMR

NullmaskMASK

$0.011170

24h: -23.27%
Market cap: $6.40M
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 401%

MoneroXMR

$118.7000

24h: +4.21%
Market cap: $10.84B
Volume 24h: $170.37M
Volatility (ann.): 41%

MASK 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% XMR

Performance

MASKXMR

7 days-49.58%-8.74%XMR
30 days-42.72%+4.12%XMR

Correlation

0.08over 36 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	MASK	XMR
Max drawdown (400d)	-77.3%	-12.5%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.10	0.12

Relative strength over 90 days: XMR outperformed MASK by 45.9% — measured on the MASK/XMR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Nullmask →Monero →