one life, its worth an attempt vs Cash Cat

Cash Cat (CASHCAT) is 156.8× the size of one life, its worth an attempt (WORTH) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, WORTH is ahead by 12.5 percentage points (WORTH -22.8% against CASHCAT -35.3%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.28 across 21 shared trading days). WORTH has been the more volatile of the two, at 458% annualised against CASHCAT's 264%.

Correlation: 0.28
Size ratio: 1 : 156.8
Ahead over 30 days: WORTH

one life, its worth an attemptWORTH

$0.000686

24h: +9.40%
Market cap: $685,500
Volume 24h: $2,916
Volatility (ann.): 458%

Cash CatCASHCAT

$0.108796

24h: +0.73%
Market cap: $107.47M
Volume 24h: $16.54M
Volatility (ann.): 264%

WORTH 0.6%Share of the two combined market caps99.4% CASHCAT

Performance

WORTHCASHCAT

7 days-24.03%+8.81%CASHCAT
30 days-22.76%-35.26%WORTH

Correlation

0.28over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	WORTH	CASHCAT
Max drawdown (400d)	-58.9%	-69.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.05	-0.02

Relative strength over 90 days: WORTH outperformed CASHCAT by 0.6% — measured on the WORTH/CASHCAT ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

one life, its worth an attempt →Cash Cat →