Paparazzi Token vs Ethereum Name Service

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is 573.9× the size of Paparazzi Token (PAPARAZZI) by market capitalisation. Over the past 1 year, ENS is ahead by 35.6 percentage points (PAPARAZZI -99.3% against ENS -63.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.05 across 364 shared trading days). PAPARAZZI has been the more volatile of the two, at 277% annualised against ENS's 82%.

Correlation: 0.05
Size ratio: 1 : 573.9
Ahead over 1 year: ENS

Paparazzi TokenPAPARAZZI

$5.257e-5

24h: +8.68%
Market cap: $365,077
Volume 24h: $19,834
Volatility (ann.): 277%

Ethereum Name ServiceENS

$4.9600

24h: +1.53%
Market cap: $209.51M
Volume 24h: $9.34M
Volatility (ann.): 82%

PAPARAZZI 0.2%Share of the two combined market caps99.8% ENS

Performance

PAPARAZZIENS

7 days-0.04%-6.51%PAPARAZZI
30 days+0.19%-29.07%PAPARAZZI
90 days+0.00%+15.09%ENS
1 year-99.33%-63.72%ENS

Correlation

0.05over 364 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0290d: 0.091y: 0.05

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	PAPARAZZI	ENS
Max drawdown (400d)	-99.7%	-82.4%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.00	0.17
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+48.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-51.6%

Relative strength over 90 days: ENS outperformed PAPARAZZI by 41.8% — measured on the PAPARAZZI/ENS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Paparazzi Token →Ethereum Name Service →