BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%BTC$75,892.02▼ 5.84%ETH$2,234.14▼ 8.03%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$688.45▼ 4.50%XRP$1.21▼ 7.44%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.17▼ 6.87%TRX$0.3181▼ 0.63%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▲ 0.05%ZEC$1,276.00▼ 2.32%HYPE$76.85▼ 8.46%XMR$118.70▼ 3.83%DOGE$0.0710▼ 8.11%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$72.94▼ 6.48%LEO$9.36▲ 0.17%LINK$10.66▼ 7.24%ADA$0.1806▼ 9.15%BCH$271.70▼ 4.12%XLM$0.1526▼ 8.97%NEAR$3.65▼ 9.24%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006226▲ 4.30%UNI$6.80▼ 11.13%LTC$51.56▼ 8.43%CC$0.0959▼ 3.56%AVAX$8.15▼ 7.12%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8391▼ 9.84%XAUT$4,073.60▲ 0.71%GRAM$1.10▼ 6.61%HBAR$0.0673▼ 7.57%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$188.41▼ 8.12%PYUSD$1.00▼ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.35%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$215.10▼ 8.59%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.45%

Pibblepan’s Coin vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 13468.8× the size of Pibblepan’s Coin (PIBBLE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.26 across 35 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 108% annualised.

Correlation
0.26
Size ratio
1 : 13468.8
Pibblepan’s CoinPIBBLE

$1.331e-5

24h
+0.11%
Market cap
$11,928
Volume 24h
$114
Volatility (ann.)
111%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.161100

24h
-6.07%
Market cap
$160.66M
Volume 24h
$30.99M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
PIBBLE 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

PIBBLEWIF

  1. 7 days-28.37%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-43.77%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.26over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricPIBBLEWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-55.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.490.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed PIBBLE by 32.8% — measured on the PIBBLE/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.