BTC$76,120.82▼ 5.41%ETH$2,253.48▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.81▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.52▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,237.64▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.28▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.77▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1833▼ 6.72%BCH$275.20▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1540▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.25▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8524▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,089.93▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.06▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.50▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,120.82▼ 5.41%ETH$2,253.48▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.81▼ 3.66%XRP$1.24▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.52▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3178▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,237.64▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.28▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0721▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.77▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1833▼ 6.72%BCH$275.20▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1540▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.67▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.86▼ 10.68%LTC$52.25▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.34▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8524▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,089.93▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0678▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.06▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.50▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

Planet Fatness vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 72056.7× the size of Planet Fatness (PHAT) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.18 across 182 shared trading days). PHAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 293% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.18
Size ratio
1 : 72056.7
Planet FatnessPHAT

$2.270e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$2,268
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
293%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164000

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
PHAT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

PHATWIF

  1. 7 days-84.38%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-88.15%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days-93.28%+21.70%WIF
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.18over 182 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2790d: 0.241y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricPHATWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-98.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.440.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed PHAT by 95.2% — measured on the PHAT/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.