Pocoland vs BNB

Pocoland (POCO) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.84 across 29 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 50% annualised.

Correlation: 0.84

PocolandPOCO

$0.000115

24h: -0.02%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $2
Volatility (ann.): 50%

BNBBNB

$721.3200

24h: +3.39%
Market cap: $94.71B
Volume 24h: $1.13B
Volatility (ann.): 50%

POCO 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

POCOBNB

7 days-3.11%-5.25%POCO
30 days-5.58%-8.45%POCO
90 days—+21.54%—
1 year—-23.14%—

Correlation

0.84over 29 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.8490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	POCO	BNB
Max drawdown (400d)	-12.0%	-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.11	0.54
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: POCO outperformed BNB by 0.8% — measured on the POCO/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Pocoland →BNB →