PokeFUN vs Bordrless

PokeFUN (POKE) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, POKE is ahead by 12.3 percentage points (POKE -87.1% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.09 across 31 shared trading days). POKE has been the more volatile of the two, at 1562% annualised against BORDR's 944%.

Correlation: -0.09
Ahead over 30 days: POKE

PokeFUNPOKE

$4.889e-6

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $49
Volatility (ann.): 1562%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

POKE 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

POKEBORDR

7 days-70.06%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-87.14%-99.45%POKE

Correlation

-0.09over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	POKE	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-95.8%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.06	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: POKE outperformed BORDR by 294.0% — measured on the POKE/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

PokeFUN →Bordrless →