BTC$80,714.26▲ 5.09%ETH$2,429.94▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.74▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.20▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3197▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,309.60▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.19▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.50▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1979▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1688▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.04▲ 7.53%UNI$7.66▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.24▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.78▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9293▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,105.57▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.49%QNT$203.70▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,714.26▲ 5.09%ETH$2,429.94▲ 7.62%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$719.74▲ 3.91%XRP$1.31▲ 4.51%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$96.20▲ 4.81%TRX$0.3197▼ 0.87%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,309.60▲ 9.41%HYPE$84.19▲ 1.79%DOGE$0.0772▲ 4.32%XMR$118.70▲ 0.66%USDS$1.00▲ 0.00%WBT$78.13▲ 5.80%LINK$11.50▲ 5.79%LEO$9.35▲ 0.43%ADA$0.1979▲ 5.52%XLM$0.1688▲ 5.49%BCH$282.90▲ 4.39%NEAR$4.04▲ 7.53%UNI$7.66▲ 8.34%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$56.24▲ 5.83%RAIN$0.005997▼ 7.34%CC$0.1001▲ 3.51%AVAX$8.78▲ 3.82%SUI$0.9293▲ 5.92%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.04%GRAM$1.17▲ 1.11%XAUT$4,105.57▲ 4.44%HBAR$0.0730▲ 6.49%QNT$203.70▲ 6.65%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 4.46%TAO$235.90▲ 6.26%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%CRO$0.0524▲ 5.61%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

POPDOG vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 494.9× the size of POPDOG (POPDOG) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move closely together (correlation 0.71 across 32 shared trading days). POPDOG has been the more volatile of the two, at 358% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.71
Size ratio
1 : 494.9
POPDOGPOPDOG

$0.000351

24h
+4.20%
Market cap
$348,301
Volume 24h
$142
Volatility (ann.)
358%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.172700

24h
+1.28%
Market cap
$172.38M
Volume 24h
$31.26M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
POPDOG 0.2%Share of the two combined market caps99.8% WIF

Performance

POPDOGWIF

  1. 7 days-99.46%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-99.36%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.71over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.7190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricPOPDOGWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-99.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.280.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed POPDOG by 99.3% — measured on the POPDOG/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.