Pump Inu vs Bordrless

Pump Inu (PI) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, PI is ahead by 14.3 percentage points (PI -85.5% against BORDR -99.8%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.02 across 23 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 907% annualised against PI's 426%.

Correlation: -0.02
Ahead over 30 days: PI

Pump InuPI

$2.795e-5

24h: -12.46%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $66
Volatility (ann.): 426%

BordrlessBORDR

$1.323e-5

24h: -10.45%
Market cap: $13,231
Volume 24h: $950,857
Volatility (ann.): 907%

PI 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

PIBORDR

7 days-25.40%-35.56%PI
30 days-85.53%-99.81%PI

Correlation

-0.02over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	PI	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-85.5%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.20	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: PI outperformed BORDR by 2236.5% — measured on the PI/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Pump Inu →Bordrless →