BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%BTC$76,060.01▼ 5.41%ETH$2,250.91▼ 7.32%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$691.07▼ 3.66%XRP$1.23▼ 5.85%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$89.47▼ 6.22%TRX$0.3177▼ 0.77%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.62%ZEC$1,232.18▼ 4.60%HYPE$78.17▼ 8.27%XMR$118.70▼ 4.02%DOGE$0.0720▼ 6.46%USDS$1.00▼ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.89%LEO$9.31▼ 0.13%LINK$10.76▼ 6.74%ADA$0.1832▼ 6.72%BCH$274.60▼ 2.19%XLM$0.1538▼ 7.94%NEAR$3.66▼ 9.11%USDE$1.00▼ 0.06%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%RAIN$0.006061▼ 2.26%UNI$6.88▼ 10.68%LTC$52.18▼ 7.26%CC$0.0965▼ 0.82%AVAX$8.33▼ 5.97%USD1$0.9986▼ 0.11%SUI$0.8519▼ 8.52%XAUT$4,088.60▲ 1.00%GRAM$1.11▼ 6.38%HBAR$0.0677▼ 6.20%USDG$1.00▼ 0.01%QNT$190.14▼ 8.05%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▼ 4.13%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$219.20▼ 6.57%CRO$0.0491▼ 5.15%

Quantum Gospel vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 9640.3× the size of Quantum Gospel (QOAT) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.12 across 33 shared trading days). QOAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 480% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.12
Size ratio
1 : 9640.3
Quantum GospelQOAT

$1.697e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$16,950
Volume 24h
$2
Volatility (ann.)
480%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.163700

24h
-5.98%
Market cap
$163.41M
Volume 24h
$31.49M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
QOAT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

QOATWIF

  1. 7 days-14.75%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days+0.55%-32.13%QOAT
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.12over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricQOATWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-64.4%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.000.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: QOAT outperformed WIF by 48.0% — measured on the QOAT/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.