BTC$80,460.66▲ 4.78%ETH$2,415.25▲ 6.93%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$715.59▲ 3.46%XRP$1.30▲ 3.83%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.62▲ 4.23%TRX$0.3200▼ 0.91%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,290.50▲ 7.51%HYPE$83.93▲ 1.04%DOGE$0.0768▲ 3.86%XMR$118.70▲ 1.83%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$77.85▲ 5.48%LINK$11.39▲ 5.34%LEO$9.34▲ 0.39%ADA$0.1959▲ 5.32%XLM$0.1669▲ 4.73%BCH$280.30▲ 3.64%NEAR$4.01▲ 6.23%UNI$7.64▲ 7.75%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.12▲ 5.37%RAIN$0.005966▼ 9.23%CC$0.0992▲ 3.66%AVAX$8.68▲ 4.36%SUI$0.9263▲ 5.78%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.06%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.93%XAUT$4,095.70▲ 3.84%HBAR$0.0723▲ 5.66%QNT$201.90▲ 6.49%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.82%TAO$234.90▲ 6.04%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%CRO$0.0520▲ 4.78%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%BTC$80,460.66▲ 4.78%ETH$2,415.25▲ 6.93%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$715.59▲ 3.46%XRP$1.30▲ 3.83%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$95.62▲ 4.23%TRX$0.3200▼ 0.91%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,290.50▲ 7.51%HYPE$83.93▲ 1.04%DOGE$0.0768▲ 3.86%XMR$118.70▲ 1.83%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$77.85▲ 5.48%LINK$11.39▲ 5.34%LEO$9.34▲ 0.39%ADA$0.1959▲ 5.32%XLM$0.1669▲ 4.73%BCH$280.30▲ 3.64%NEAR$4.01▲ 6.23%UNI$7.64▲ 7.75%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.07%LTC$56.12▲ 5.37%RAIN$0.005966▼ 9.23%CC$0.0992▲ 3.66%AVAX$8.68▲ 4.36%SUI$0.9263▲ 5.78%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.06%GRAM$1.17▲ 0.93%XAUT$4,095.70▲ 3.84%HBAR$0.0723▲ 5.66%QNT$201.90▲ 6.49%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 3.82%TAO$234.90▲ 6.04%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%CRO$0.0520▲ 4.78%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%

Qubic vs Bittensor

Bittensor (TAO) is 44.4× the size of Qubic (QUBIC) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.34 across 55 shared trading days). TAO has been the more volatile of the two, at 97% annualised against QUBIC's 78%.

Correlation
0.34
Size ratio
1 : 44.4
QubicQUBIC

$4.222e-7

24h
+0.02%
Market cap
$61.93M
Volume 24h
$787,817
Volatility (ann.)
78%
BittensorTAO

$234.9000

24h
+6.04%
Market cap
$2.75B
Volume 24h
$122.41M
Volatility (ann.)
97%
QUBIC 2.2%Share of the two combined market caps97.8% TAO

Performance

QUBICTAO

  1. 7 days-0.08%-9.05%QUBIC
  2. 30 days+6.71%-23.47%QUBIC
  3. 90 days—+21.74%—
  4. 1 year—-41.66%—

Correlation

0.34over 55 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricQUBICTAO
Max drawdown (400d)-21.6%-70.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.040.25
Best 30 days (past year)—+104.1%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-48.1%

Relative strength over 90 days: TAO outperformed QUBIC by 10.9% — measured on the QUBIC/TAO ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.