BTC$76,240.01▼ 5.64%ETH$2,244.08▼ 7.86%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$696.08▼ 3.10%XRP$1.22▼ 6.97%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.45▼ 6.47%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.43%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.01%ZEC$1,314.49▼ 0.42%HYPE$78.09▼ 7.73%XMR$118.70▼ 2.77%DOGE$0.0723▼ 6.47%USDS$1.00▼ 0.00%WBT$73.01▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.02%LINK$10.91▼ 5.35%ADA$0.1854▼ 6.56%BCH$276.70▼ 2.35%XLM$0.1559▼ 7.78%NEAR$3.73▼ 8.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006147▲ 2.60%UNI$7.00▼ 8.82%LTC$52.59▼ 6.73%CC$0.0969▼ 3.63%AVAX$8.32▼ 5.83%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8654▼ 7.18%XAUT$4,048.94▼ 1.41%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.47%HBAR$0.0686▼ 6.04%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$191.16▼ 6.68%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.09%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.90▼ 6.93%CRO$0.0492▼ 5.85%BTC$76,240.01▼ 5.64%ETH$2,244.08▼ 7.86%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$696.08▼ 3.10%XRP$1.22▼ 6.97%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.45▼ 6.47%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.43%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.01%ZEC$1,314.49▼ 0.42%HYPE$78.09▼ 7.73%XMR$118.70▼ 2.77%DOGE$0.0723▼ 6.47%USDS$1.00▼ 0.00%WBT$73.01▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.02%LINK$10.91▼ 5.35%ADA$0.1854▼ 6.56%BCH$276.70▼ 2.35%XLM$0.1559▼ 7.78%NEAR$3.73▼ 8.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006147▲ 2.60%UNI$7.00▼ 8.82%LTC$52.59▼ 6.73%CC$0.0969▼ 3.63%AVAX$8.32▼ 5.83%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8654▼ 7.18%XAUT$4,048.94▼ 1.41%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.47%HBAR$0.0686▼ 6.04%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$191.16▼ 6.68%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.09%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.90▼ 6.93%CRO$0.0492▼ 5.85%

Randy vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 12975.4× the size of Randy (RANDY) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.30 across 40 shared trading days). RANDY has been the more volatile of the two, at 356% annualised against WIF's 105%.

Correlation
0.30
Size ratio
1 : 12975.4
RandyRANDY

$1.273e-5

24h
+2.23%
Market cap
$12,733
Volume 24h
$4,659
Volatility (ann.)
356%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.166300

24h
-4.79%
Market cap
$165.21M
Volume 24h
$32.20M
Volatility (ann.)
105%
RANDY 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

RANDYWIF

  1. 7 days-13.94%-2.82%WIF
  2. 30 days-78.28%-34.09%WIF
  3. 90 days—+17.59%—
  4. 1 year—-62.97%—

Correlation

0.30over 40 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricRANDYWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-94.4%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.260.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed RANDY by 92.4% — measured on the RANDY/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.