ReinforcedAI vs lium

lium (SN51) is 68.0× the size of ReinforcedAI (SN92) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN51 is ahead by 84.0 percentage points (SN92 -62.4% against SN51 +21.6%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.18 across 21 shared trading days). SN92 has been the more volatile of the two, at 181% annualised against SN51's 139%.

Correlation: -0.18
Size ratio: 1 : 68.0
Ahead over 30 days: SN51

ReinforcedAISN92

$5.1000

24h: +4.11%
Market cap: $2.08M
Volume 24h: $184,765
Volatility (ann.): 181%

liumSN51

$27.8500

24h: +4.49%
Market cap: $141.32M
Volume 24h: $1.71M
Volatility (ann.): 139%

SN92 1.4%Share of the two combined market caps98.6% SN51

Performance

SN92SN51

7 days-3.57%-12.01%SN92
30 days-62.44%+21.60%SN51

Correlation

-0.18over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN92	SN51
Max drawdown (400d)	-62.4%	-19.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.35	0.66

Relative strength over 90 days: SN51 outperformed SN92 by 75.0% — measured on the SN92/SN51 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

ReinforcedAI →lium →