ReinforcedAI vs Chutes

Chutes (SN64) is 47.8× the size of ReinforcedAI (SN92) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN64 is ahead by 59.0 percentage points (SN92 -62.4% against SN64 -3.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.11 across 21 shared trading days). SN92 has been the more volatile of the two, at 181% annualised against SN64's 140%.

Correlation: -0.11
Size ratio: 1 : 47.8
Ahead over 30 days: SN64

ReinforcedAISN92

$5.1000

24h: +4.11%
Market cap: $2.08M
Volume 24h: $184,765
Volatility (ann.): 181%

ChutesSN64

$15.6900

24h: +2.18%
Market cap: $99.44M
Volume 24h: $507,749
Volatility (ann.): 140%

SN92 2.0%Share of the two combined market caps98.0% SN64

Performance

SN92SN64

7 days-3.57%-8.16%SN92
30 days-62.44%-3.47%SN64

Correlation

-0.11over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN92	SN64
Max drawdown (400d)	-62.4%	-32.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.35	0.03

Relative strength over 90 days: SN64 outperformed SN92 by 70.3% — measured on the SN92/SN64 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

ReinforcedAI →Chutes →