ReinforcedAI vs EfficientFrontier

EfficientFrontier (SN53) is 18.5× the size of ReinforcedAI (SN92) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN53 is ahead by 65.8 percentage points (SN92 -62.4% against SN53 +3.3%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.08 across 25 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 190% annualised.

Correlation: 0.08
Size ratio: 1 : 18.5
Ahead over 30 days: SN53

ReinforcedAISN92

$5.1000

24h: +4.11%
Market cap: $2.08M
Volume 24h: $184,765
Volatility (ann.): 181%

EfficientFrontierSN53

$6.5600

24h: -4.62%
Market cap: $38.39M
Volume 24h: $1.91M
Volatility (ann.): 198%

SN92 5.1%Share of the two combined market caps94.9% SN53

Performance

SN92SN53

7 days-3.57%-20.65%SN92
30 days-62.44%+3.32%SN53

Correlation

0.08over 25 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN92	SN53
Max drawdown (400d)	-62.4%	-41.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.35	0.06

Relative strength over 90 days: SN53 outperformed SN92 by 74.7% — measured on the SN92/SN53 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

ReinforcedAI →EfficientFrontier →