RSIC•GENESIS•RUNE vs MAGIC•INTERNET•MONEY (Bitcoin)

MAGIC•INTERNET•MONEY (Bitcoin) (MIM) is 4.4× the size of RSIC•GENESIS•RUNE (RSIC) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, MIM is ahead by 25.7 percentage points (RSIC -33.0% against MIM -7.3%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.15 across 29 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 164% annualised.

Correlation: 0.15
Size ratio: 1 : 4.4
Ahead over 30 days: MIM

RSIC•GENESIS•RUNERSIC

$0.000121

24h: —
Market cap: $2.55M
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 174%

MAGIC•INTERNET•MONEY (Bitcoin)MIM

$0.000530

24h: -1.62%
Market cap: $11.13M
Volume 24h: $4,451
Volatility (ann.): 154%

RSIC 18.6%Share of the two combined market caps81.4% MIM

Performance

RSICMIM

7 days-9.35%-14.05%RSIC
30 days-33.04%-7.32%MIM

Correlation

0.15over 29 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	RSIC	MIM
Max drawdown (400d)	-46.2%	-29.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.19	0.00

Relative strength over 90 days: MIM outperformed RSIC by 43.0% — measured on the RSIC/MIM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

RSIC•GENESIS•RUNE →MAGIC•INTERNET•MONEY (Bitcoin) →