RUNUP vs Bordrless

RUNUP (RUNUP) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, RUNUP is ahead by 57.0 percentage points (RUNUP -41.7% against BORDR -98.7%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.13 across 34 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 959% annualised against RUNUP's 468%.

Correlation: -0.13
Ahead over 30 days: RUNUP

RUNUPRUNUP

$0.000127

24h: -10.24%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $1,539
Volatility (ann.): 468%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 959%

RUNUP 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

RUNUPBORDR

7 days+5.89%-16.86%RUNUP
30 days-41.74%-98.75%RUNUP

Correlation

-0.13over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2390d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	RUNUP	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-58.1%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.03	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: RUNUP outperformed BORDR by 3479.1% — measured on the RUNUP/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

RUNUP →Bordrless →