SENSO vs StarLink

SENSO (SENSO) and StarLink (STARL) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.15 across 29 shared trading days). STARL has been the more volatile of the two, at 73% annualised against SENSO's 34%.

Correlation: -0.15

SENSOSENSO

$0.002806

24h: +0.09%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $40,564
Volatility (ann.): 34%

StarLinkSTARL

$1.278e-7

24h: +0.92%
Market cap: $1.28M
Volume 24h: $153
Volatility (ann.): 73%

SENSO 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% STARL

Performance

SENSOSTARL

7 days-1.12%-5.08%SENSO
30 days-9.77%-14.13%SENSO
90 days-11.47%——
1 year-7.67%——

Correlation

-0.15over 29 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SENSO	STARL
Max drawdown (400d)	-26.7%	-20.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.36	-0.11

Relative strength over 90 days: STARL outperformed SENSO by 19.4% — measured on the SENSO/STARL ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

SENSO →StarLink →