BTC$80,411.87▲ 3.01%ETH$2,415.60▲ 5.03%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.06%BNB$712.58▲ 1.47%XRP$1.31▲ 2.85%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$95.98▲ 3.04%TRX$0.3185▼ 1.02%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.52%ZEC$1,321.52▲ 3.44%HYPE$83.36▼ 2.16%DOGE$0.0765▲ 2.04%XMR$118.70▼ 0.42%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$77.72▲ 3.60%LINK$11.54▲ 3.75%LEO$9.36▲ 0.58%ADA$0.1974▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1661▲ 2.24%BCH$285.20▲ 3.48%NEAR$4.03▲ 0.20%UNI$7.60▲ 1.51%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.94▲ 2.49%RAIN$0.005802▼ 6.95%CC$0.1029▲ 3.44%AVAX$8.76▲ 2.00%SUI$0.9231▲ 2.32%USD1$0.9989▲ 0.00%GRAM$1.17▼ 0.71%XAUT$4,105.92▲ 2.30%HBAR$0.0728▲ 3.59%QNT$205.50▲ 5.72%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.07%TAO$235.20▲ 2.61%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0522▲ 3.44%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%BTC$80,411.87▲ 3.01%ETH$2,415.60▲ 5.03%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.06%BNB$712.58▲ 1.47%XRP$1.31▲ 2.85%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$95.98▲ 3.04%TRX$0.3185▼ 1.02%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.52%ZEC$1,321.52▲ 3.44%HYPE$83.36▼ 2.16%DOGE$0.0765▲ 2.04%XMR$118.70▼ 0.42%USDS$1.00▲ 0.04%WBT$77.72▲ 3.60%LINK$11.54▲ 3.75%LEO$9.36▲ 0.58%ADA$0.1974▲ 3.39%XLM$0.1661▲ 2.24%BCH$285.20▲ 3.48%NEAR$4.03▲ 0.20%UNI$7.60▲ 1.51%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.94▲ 2.49%RAIN$0.005802▼ 6.95%CC$0.1029▲ 3.44%AVAX$8.76▲ 2.00%SUI$0.9231▲ 2.32%USD1$0.9989▲ 0.00%GRAM$1.17▼ 0.71%XAUT$4,105.92▲ 2.30%HBAR$0.0728▲ 3.59%QNT$205.50▲ 5.72%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.07%TAO$235.20▲ 2.61%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0522▲ 3.44%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.04%

SETZ vs Ethereum Name Service

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is 3329.9× the size of SETZ (SETZ) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.30 across 35 shared trading days). SETZ has been the more volatile of the two, at 138% annualised against ENS's 82%.

Correlation
0.30
Size ratio
1 : 3329.9
SETZSETZ

$7.610e-7

24h
+15.97%
Market cap
$64,697
Volume 24h
$1,769
Volatility (ann.)
138%
Ethereum Name ServiceENS

$5.1000

24h
+3.21%
Market cap
$215.43M
Volume 24h
$11.98M
Volatility (ann.)
82%
SETZ 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% ENS

Performance

SETZENS

  1. 7 days+16.02%-3.96%SETZ
  2. 30 days-37.71%-25.80%ENS
  3. 90 days—+21.19%—
  4. 1 year—-59.35%—

Correlation

0.30over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricSETZENS
Max drawdown (400d)-62.4%-82.4%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.400.23
Best 30 days (past year)—+48.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-51.6%

Relative strength over 90 days: ENS outperformed SETZ by 38.7% — measured on the SETZ/ENS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.