BTC$80,122.01▲ 3.08%ETH$2,416.97▲ 5.76%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.02%BNB$715.94▲ 2.43%XRP$1.30▲ 2.08%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$94.81▲ 1.59%TRX$0.3199▼ 1.12%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.91%ZEC$1,292.60▲ 6.34%HYPE$83.61▼ 2.03%DOGE$0.0767▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 0.37%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.63▲ 3.85%LINK$11.41▲ 3.18%LEO$9.34▲ 0.73%ADA$0.1961▲ 3.13%XLM$0.1659▲ 2.29%BCH$280.80▲ 2.27%NEAR$4.02▲ 4.70%UNI$7.59▲ 5.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.04%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%LTC$55.94▲ 2.90%RAIN$0.006002▼ 2.25%AVAX$8.77▲ 3.18%CC$0.0974▲ 1.42%SUI$0.9234▲ 3.20%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.03%GRAM$1.18▲ 1.20%XAUT$4,046.29▲ 3.36%HBAR$0.0719▲ 3.69%QNT$203.52▲ 6.04%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.43%TAO$233.00▲ 3.12%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0514▲ 2.02%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%BTC$80,122.01▲ 3.08%ETH$2,416.97▲ 5.76%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.02%BNB$715.94▲ 2.43%XRP$1.30▲ 2.08%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$94.81▲ 1.59%TRX$0.3199▼ 1.12%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.91%ZEC$1,292.60▲ 6.34%HYPE$83.61▼ 2.03%DOGE$0.0767▲ 2.17%XMR$118.70▲ 0.37%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.63▲ 3.85%LINK$11.41▲ 3.18%LEO$9.34▲ 0.73%ADA$0.1961▲ 3.13%XLM$0.1659▲ 2.29%BCH$280.80▲ 2.27%NEAR$4.02▲ 4.70%UNI$7.59▲ 5.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.04%DAI$1.00▲ 0.00%LTC$55.94▲ 2.90%RAIN$0.006002▼ 2.25%AVAX$8.77▲ 3.18%CC$0.0974▲ 1.42%SUI$0.9234▲ 3.20%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.03%GRAM$1.18▲ 1.20%XAUT$4,046.29▲ 3.36%HBAR$0.0719▲ 3.69%QNT$203.52▲ 6.04%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.43%TAO$233.00▲ 3.12%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0514▲ 2.02%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%

Shiba Inu Treat vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 192.0× the size of Shiba Inu Treat (TREAT) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.55 across 39 shared trading days). TREAT has been the more volatile of the two, at 146% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.55
Size ratio
1 : 192.0
Shiba Inu TreatTREAT

$0.000159

24h
-0.35%
Market cap
$888,955
Volume 24h
$39,950
Volatility (ann.)
146%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.170100

24h
-0.69%
Market cap
$170.65M
Volume 24h
$28.92M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
TREAT 0.5%Share of the two combined market caps99.5% WIF

Performance

TREATWIF

  1. 7 days+6.91%-4.50%TREAT
  2. 30 days+3.35%-32.23%TREAT
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.55over 39 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricTREATWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-31.0%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.120.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed TREAT by 6.3% — measured on the TREAT/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.