BTC$76,240.01▼ 5.64%ETH$2,244.08▼ 7.86%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$696.08▼ 3.10%XRP$1.22▼ 6.97%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.45▼ 6.47%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.43%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.01%ZEC$1,314.49▼ 0.42%HYPE$78.09▼ 7.73%XMR$118.70▼ 2.77%DOGE$0.0723▼ 6.47%USDS$1.00▼ 0.00%WBT$73.01▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.02%LINK$10.91▼ 5.35%ADA$0.1854▼ 6.56%BCH$276.70▼ 2.35%XLM$0.1559▼ 7.78%NEAR$3.73▼ 8.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006147▲ 2.60%UNI$7.00▼ 8.82%LTC$52.59▼ 6.73%CC$0.0969▼ 3.63%AVAX$8.32▼ 5.83%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8654▼ 7.18%XAUT$4,048.94▼ 1.41%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.47%HBAR$0.0686▼ 6.04%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$191.16▼ 6.68%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.09%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.90▼ 6.93%CRO$0.0492▼ 5.85%BTC$76,240.01▼ 5.64%ETH$2,244.08▼ 7.86%USDT$0.9990▼ 0.04%BNB$696.08▼ 3.10%XRP$1.22▼ 6.97%USDC$1.00▼ 0.02%SOL$90.45▼ 6.47%TRX$0.3186▼ 0.43%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▼ 1.01%ZEC$1,314.49▼ 0.42%HYPE$78.09▼ 7.73%XMR$118.70▼ 2.77%DOGE$0.0723▼ 6.47%USDS$1.00▼ 0.00%WBT$73.01▼ 6.31%LEO$9.35▲ 0.02%LINK$10.91▼ 5.35%ADA$0.1854▼ 6.56%BCH$276.70▼ 2.35%XLM$0.1559▼ 7.78%NEAR$3.73▼ 8.28%USDE$1.00▼ 0.08%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%RAIN$0.006147▲ 2.60%UNI$7.00▼ 8.82%LTC$52.59▼ 6.73%CC$0.0969▼ 3.63%AVAX$8.32▼ 5.83%USD1$0.9991▼ 0.08%SUI$0.8654▼ 7.18%XAUT$4,048.94▼ 1.41%GRAM$1.11▼ 5.47%HBAR$0.0686▼ 6.04%USDG$1.00▼ 0.00%QNT$191.16▼ 6.68%SHIB$0.000005▼ 3.09%PYUSD$0.9998▼ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%TAO$220.90▼ 6.93%CRO$0.0492▼ 5.85%

Shibetoshi Nakamoto vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 7259.4× the size of Shibetoshi Nakamoto (BILLY) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.22 across 32 shared trading days). BILLY has been the more volatile of the two, at 2412% annualised against WIF's 105%.

Correlation
-0.22
Size ratio
1 : 7259.4
Shibetoshi NakamotoBILLY

$2.372e-5

24h
-2.59%
Market cap
$22,758
Volume 24h
$113
Volatility (ann.)
2412%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.166300

24h
-4.79%
Market cap
$165.21M
Volume 24h
$32.20M
Volatility (ann.)
105%
BILLY 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BILLYWIF

  1. 7 days-19.98%-2.82%WIF
  2. 30 days-22.01%-34.09%BILLY
  3. 90 days—+17.59%—
  4. 1 year—-62.97%—

Correlation

-0.22over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBILLYWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-91.9%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.010.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: BILLY outperformed WIF by 21.2% — measured on the BILLY/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.