Shielded cat vs Bordrless

Shielded cat (SCAT) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, SCAT is ahead by 60.8 percentage points (SCAT -38.7% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.16 across 24 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against SCAT's 614%.

Correlation: 0.16
Ahead over 30 days: SCAT

Shielded catSCAT

$2.539e-6

24h: -0.91%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $5
Volatility (ann.): 614%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

SCAT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

SCATBORDR

7 days-1.02%-10.80%SCAT
30 days-38.69%-99.45%SCAT

Correlation

0.16over 24 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SCAT	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-50.0%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.09	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: SCAT outperformed BORDR by 1575.2% — measured on the SCAT/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Shielded cat →Bordrless →