Shill vs GREEN MORNING

Shill (SHILL) and GREEN MORNING (GM) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, GM is ahead by 136.6 percentage points (SHILL -96.8% against GM +39.7%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.15 across 25 shared trading days). GM has been the more volatile of the two, at 541674% annualised against SHILL's 376%.

Correlation: -0.15
Ahead over 30 days: GM

ShillSHILL

$2.818e-6

24h: -0.18%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $4
Volatility (ann.): 376%

GREEN MORNINGGM

$0.003109

24h: +14.73%
Market cap: $3.11M
Volume 24h: $1.87M
Volatility (ann.): 541674%

SHILL 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% GM

Performance

SHILLGM

7 days-12.20%+1520.64%GM
30 days-96.83%+39.72%GM

Correlation

-0.15over 25 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.1590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SHILL	GM
Max drawdown (400d)	-96.8%	-100.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.26	0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: GM outperformed SHILL by 100.0% — measured on the SHILL/GM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Shill →GREEN MORNING →