Six Sigma vs Ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) is 828281.6× the size of Six Sigma (SIX) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.35 across 181 shared trading days). SIX has been the more volatile of the two, at 128% annualised against ETH's 62%.
Performance
| Period | SIX | ETH | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | +9.71% | +0.68% | SIX |
| 30 days | -15.61% | +11.90% | ETH |
| 90 days | -75.93% | +53.93% | ETH |
| 1 year | — | -37.76% | — |
Risk & extremes
| Metric | SIX | ETH |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -99.0% | -66.7% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.59 | 1.00 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +34.1% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -44.6% |
Relative strength over 90 days: ETH outperformed SIX by 81.7% — measured on the SIX/ETH ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.
Correlation
0.35over 181 shared trading days
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.6390d: 0.251y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.