BTC$79,159.00▲ 2.27%ETH$2,338.09▲ 1.96%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$705.39▲ 0.73%XRP$1.30▲ 0.34%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$94.06▼ 0.20%TRX$0.3193▼ 1.05%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.69%ZEC$1,314.86▲ 8.02%HYPE$85.87▼ 1.47%XMR$118.70▲ 3.01%DOGE$0.0760▲ 0.05%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.23▲ 1.34%LEO$9.33▲ 0.47%LINK$11.29▼ 0.18%ADA$0.1924▼ 0.17%XLM$0.1651▼ 1.56%BCH$276.50▼ 1.18%NEAR$4.09▲ 3.26%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.43▲ 0.12%RAIN$0.006034▼ 3.76%LTC$55.56▲ 0.95%CC$0.0976▲ 1.63%AVAX$8.78▲ 1.07%SUI$0.9167▲ 1.46%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.08%GRAM$1.18▲ 2.13%XAUT$4,034.17▲ 2.23%HBAR$0.0725▲ 0.60%QNT$203.32▲ 2.41%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.71%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$232.10▲ 1.09%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▲ 0.24%BTC$79,159.00▲ 2.27%ETH$2,338.09▲ 1.96%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$705.39▲ 0.73%XRP$1.30▲ 0.34%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$94.06▼ 0.20%TRX$0.3193▼ 1.05%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.69%ZEC$1,314.86▲ 8.02%HYPE$85.87▼ 1.47%XMR$118.70▲ 3.01%DOGE$0.0760▲ 0.05%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$75.23▲ 1.34%LEO$9.33▲ 0.47%LINK$11.29▼ 0.18%ADA$0.1924▼ 0.17%XLM$0.1651▼ 1.56%BCH$276.50▼ 1.18%NEAR$4.09▲ 3.26%USDE$1.00▲ 0.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.43▲ 0.12%RAIN$0.006034▼ 3.76%LTC$55.56▲ 0.95%CC$0.0976▲ 1.63%AVAX$8.78▲ 1.07%SUI$0.9167▲ 1.46%USD1$0.9996▲ 0.08%GRAM$1.18▲ 2.13%XAUT$4,034.17▲ 2.23%HBAR$0.0725▲ 0.60%QNT$203.32▲ 2.41%USDG$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▲ 0.71%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.01%TAO$232.10▲ 1.09%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0507▲ 0.24%

Somnium Space CUBEs vs Render

Render (RENDER) is 340.2× the size of Somnium Space CUBEs (CUBE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.42 across 32 shared trading days). CUBE has been the more volatile of the two, at 112% annualised against RENDER's 95%.

Correlation
0.42
Size ratio
1 : 340.2
Somnium Space CUBEsCUBE

$0.064169

24h
—
Market cap
$2.44M
Volume 24h
$659
Volatility (ann.)
112%
RenderRENDER

$1.5710

24h
+2.17%
Market cap
$830.35M
Volume 24h
$29.31M
Volatility (ann.)
95%
CUBE 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% RENDER

Performance

CUBERENDER

  1. 7 days-12.50%-12.29%RENDER
  2. 30 days-22.81%-24.47%CUBE
  3. 90 days—+12.44%—
  4. 1 year—-25.49%—

Correlation

0.42over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.4490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricCUBERENDER
Max drawdown (400d)-28.2%-66.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.250.17
Best 30 days (past year)—+82.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-49.7%

Relative strength over 90 days: RENDER outperformed CUBE by 32.7% — measured on the CUBE/RENDER ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.