BTC$80,520.01▲ 3.32%ETH$2,427.92▲ 5.96%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$719.37▲ 2.58%XRP$1.31▲ 2.17%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.61▲ 2.29%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.72%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.22%ZEC$1,309.01▲ 6.06%HYPE$83.94▼ 1.98%DOGE$0.0773▲ 2.28%XMR$118.70▲ 1.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.82▲ 4.09%LINK$11.50▲ 3.46%LEO$9.34▲ 0.69%ADA$0.1986▲ 4.02%XLM$0.1678▲ 2.94%BCH$282.20▲ 2.61%NEAR$4.04▲ 4.71%UNI$7.72▲ 7.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.04%LTC$56.23▲ 3.06%RAIN$0.005967▼ 9.02%CC$0.0985▲ 1.68%AVAX$8.78▲ 2.83%SUI$0.9381▲ 4.29%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.18▲ 0.91%XAUT$4,046.46▲ 3.05%HBAR$0.0728▲ 4.27%QNT$205.52▲ 6.27%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.76%TAO$235.50▲ 3.46%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0519▲ 2.85%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%BTC$80,520.01▲ 3.32%ETH$2,427.92▲ 5.96%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.02%BNB$719.37▲ 2.58%XRP$1.31▲ 2.17%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$95.61▲ 2.29%TRX$0.3199▼ 0.72%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.22%ZEC$1,309.01▲ 6.06%HYPE$83.94▼ 1.98%DOGE$0.0773▲ 2.28%XMR$118.70▲ 1.08%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$77.82▲ 4.09%LINK$11.50▲ 3.46%LEO$9.34▲ 0.69%ADA$0.1986▲ 4.02%XLM$0.1678▲ 2.94%BCH$282.20▲ 2.61%NEAR$4.04▲ 4.71%UNI$7.72▲ 7.02%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$1.00▲ 0.04%LTC$56.23▲ 3.06%RAIN$0.005967▼ 9.02%CC$0.0985▲ 1.68%AVAX$8.78▲ 2.83%SUI$0.9381▲ 4.29%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.18▲ 0.91%XAUT$4,046.46▲ 3.05%HBAR$0.0728▲ 4.27%QNT$205.52▲ 6.27%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.76%TAO$235.50▲ 3.46%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0519▲ 2.85%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%

Sperax vs Bitway

Bitway (BTW) is 330.7× the size of Sperax (SPA) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.36 across 45 shared trading days). BTW has been the more volatile of the two, at 365% annualised against SPA's 79%.

Correlation
0.36
Size ratio
1 : 330.7
SperaxSPA

$0.002450

24h
+2.42%
Market cap
$4.69M
Volume 24h
$132,565
Volatility (ann.)
79%
BitwayBTW

$1.0290

24h
+6.10%
Market cap
$1.55B
Volume 24h
$6.39M
Volatility (ann.)
365%
SPA 0.3%Share of the two combined market caps99.7% BTW

Performance

SPABTW

  1. 7 days+0.79%-44.93%SPA
  2. 30 days+12.41%+73.36%BTW
  3. 90 days+9.85%——

Correlation

0.36over 45 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricSPABTW
Max drawdown (400d)-26.9%-60.7%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)0.120.43

Relative strength over 90 days: BTW outperformed SPA by 51.6% — measured on the SPA/BTW ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.