STA vs BNB

STA (STA) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.16 across 25 shared trading days). BNB has been the more volatile of the two, at 50% annualised against STA's 9%.

Correlation: 0.16

STASTA

$2.109e-5

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $3
Volatility (ann.): 9%

BNBBNB

$719.2100

24h: +3.85%
Market cap: $94.65B
Volume 24h: $1.12B
Volatility (ann.): 50%

STA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

STABNB

7 days+0.00%-5.25%STA
30 days-2.63%-8.45%STA
90 days—+21.54%—
1 year—-23.14%—

Correlation

0.16over 25 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	STA	BNB
Max drawdown (400d)	-2.7%	-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.29	0.54
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: STA outperformed BNB by 3.9% — measured on the STA/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

STA →BNB →