Stargate Bridged Pearl (Avalanche) vs Agent Wormhole

Stargate Bridged Pearl (Avalanche) (PEARL) and Agent Wormhole (WORM) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, WORM is ahead by 169.6 percentage points (PEARL -31.2% against WORM +138.4%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.31 across 33 shared trading days). WORM has been the more volatile of the two, at 632% annualised against PEARL's 46%.

Correlation: 0.31
Ahead over 30 days: WORM

Stargate Bridged Pearl (Avalanche)PEARL

$0.003709

24h: -0.17%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $460
Volatility (ann.): 46%

Agent WormholeWORM

$0.002161

24h: -2.65%
Market cap: $2.07M
Volume 24h: $259,123
Volatility (ann.): 632%

PEARL 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WORM

Performance

PEARLWORM

7 days-3.69%+31.25%WORM
30 days-31.19%+138.45%WORM

Correlation

0.31over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	PEARL	WORM
Max drawdown (400d)	-33.0%	-73.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.68	0.08

Relative strength over 90 days: WORM outperformed PEARL by 65.9% — measured on the PEARL/WORM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Stargate Bridged Pearl (Avalanche) →Agent Wormhole →