Stargate Bridged Shell (Avalanche) vs Agent Wormhole

Stargate Bridged Shell (Avalanche) (SHELL) and Agent Wormhole (WORM) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, WORM is ahead by 175.8 percentage points (SHELL -37.3% against WORM +138.4%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.29 across 32 shared trading days). WORM has been the more volatile of the two, at 632% annualised against SHELL's 59%.

Correlation: 0.29
Ahead over 30 days: WORM

Stargate Bridged Shell (Avalanche)SHELL

$0.000287

24h: -2.71%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $121
Volatility (ann.): 59%

Agent WormholeWORM

$0.002161

24h: -2.65%
Market cap: $2.07M
Volume 24h: $259,123
Volatility (ann.): 632%

SHELL 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WORM

Performance

SHELLWORM

7 days-7.73%+31.25%WORM
30 days-37.34%+138.45%WORM

Correlation

0.29over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2990d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SHELL	WORM
Max drawdown (400d)	-39.9%	-73.6%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.66	0.08

Relative strength over 90 days: WORM outperformed SHELL by 69.8% — measured on the SHELL/WORM ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Stargate Bridged Shell (Avalanche) →Agent Wormhole →