Stealf vs Bordrless

Stealf (STEALF) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, STEALF is ahead by 48.1 percentage points (STEALF -51.4% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.15 across 35 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against STEALF's 193%.

Correlation: -0.15
Ahead over 30 days: STEALF

StealfSTEALF

$0.000172

24h: +4.43%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $2,668
Volatility (ann.): 193%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

STEALF 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

STEALFBORDR

7 days-7.05%-10.80%STEALF
30 days-51.37%-99.45%STEALF

Correlation

-0.15over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	STEALF	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-74.1%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.37	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: STEALF outperformed BORDR by 1509.7% — measured on the STEALF/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Stealf →Bordrless →