BTC$75,882.01▼ 0.42%ETH$2,240.65▼ 0.06%USDT$0.9992▲ 0.02%BNB$694.50▼ 0.32%XRP$1.16▼ 2.92%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$89.72▼ 0.86%TRX$0.3198▲ 0.45%FIGR_HELOC$1.02▼ 1.26%ZEC$1,287.94▼ 2.45%HYPE$77.66▼ 1.13%XMR$118.70▼ 1.66%DOGE$0.0717▼ 1.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$72.86▼ 0.41%LEO$9.34▲ 0.07%LINK$10.79▼ 1.13%ADA$0.1823▼ 2.32%XLM$0.1519▼ 1.61%BCH$257.30▼ 4.42%NEAR$3.70▼ 1.06%USDE$1.00▲ 0.05%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.04▲ 1.23%LTC$52.02▼ 1.68%RAIN$0.005627▼ 2.39%CC$0.0944▼ 2.58%AVAX$8.23▼ 1.96%SUI$0.8591▼ 1.10%USD1$0.9989▲ 0.03%XAUT$4,065.18▲ 0.28%GRAM$1.10▼ 0.36%HBAR$0.0676▼ 1.32%QNT$197.15▲ 3.58%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000004▼ 1.99%TAO$223.80▲ 0.08%CRO$0.0487▼ 2.65%BTC$75,882.01▼ 0.42%ETH$2,240.65▼ 0.06%USDT$0.9992▲ 0.02%BNB$694.50▼ 0.32%XRP$1.16▼ 2.92%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$89.72▼ 0.86%TRX$0.3198▲ 0.45%FIGR_HELOC$1.02▼ 1.26%ZEC$1,287.94▼ 2.45%HYPE$77.66▼ 1.13%XMR$118.70▼ 1.66%DOGE$0.0717▼ 1.17%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$72.86▼ 0.41%LEO$9.34▲ 0.07%LINK$10.79▼ 1.13%ADA$0.1823▼ 2.32%XLM$0.1519▼ 1.61%BCH$257.30▼ 4.42%NEAR$3.70▼ 1.06%USDE$1.00▲ 0.05%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%UNI$7.04▲ 1.23%LTC$52.02▼ 1.68%RAIN$0.005627▼ 2.39%CC$0.0944▼ 2.58%AVAX$8.23▼ 1.96%SUI$0.8591▼ 1.10%USD1$0.9989▲ 0.03%XAUT$4,065.18▲ 0.28%GRAM$1.10▼ 0.36%HBAR$0.0676▼ 1.32%QNT$197.15▲ 3.58%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%USDG$1.00▲ 0.00%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000004▼ 1.99%TAO$223.80▲ 0.08%CRO$0.0487▼ 2.65%

Stellar vs Provenance Blockchain

Stellar (XLM) is 14.9× the size of Provenance Blockchain (HASH) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.01 across 61 shared trading days). HASH has been the more volatile of the two, at 156% annualised against XLM's 78%.

Correlation
-0.01
Size ratio
14.9×
StellarXLM

$0.151900

24h
-1.61%
Market cap
$5.38B
Volume 24h
$107.85M
Volatility (ann.)
78%
Provenance BlockchainHASH

$0.006015

24h
-5.05%
Market cap
$360.43M
Volume 24h
$1,601
Volatility (ann.)
156%
XLM 93.7%Share of the two combined market caps6.3% HASH

Performance

XLMHASH

  1. 7 days-10.30%-14.63%XLM
  2. 30 days-23.54%-14.01%HASH
  3. 90 days-6.87%——
  4. 1 year-43.16%——

Correlation

-0.01over 61 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricXLMHASH
Max drawdown (400d)-64.9%-30.9%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.09-0.10
Best 30 days (past year)+63.3%—
Worst 30 days (past year)-39.7%—

Relative strength over 90 days: XLM outperformed HASH by 15.3% — measured on the XLM/HASH ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.