Stonk Cat vs Bordrless

Stonk Cat (STONKCAT) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, STONKCAT is ahead by 55.9 percentage points (STONKCAT -43.6% against BORDR -99.5%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.05 across 30 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 944% annualised against STONKCAT's 290%.

Correlation: 0.05
Ahead over 30 days: STONKCAT

Stonk CatSTONKCAT

$4.781e-5

24h: -0.52%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $298
Volatility (ann.): 290%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 944%

STONKCAT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

STONKCATBORDR

7 days-20.45%-10.80%BORDR
30 days-43.60%-99.45%STONKCAT

Correlation

0.05over 30 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	STONKCAT	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-68.7%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.23	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: STONKCAT outperformed BORDR by 883.5% — measured on the STONKCAT/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Stonk Cat →Bordrless →