BTC$79,762.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,388.56▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.99▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,314.69▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.79▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.44▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1944▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.10▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.96▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.14▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.69▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9120▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,111.82▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.29▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$232.20▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%BTC$79,762.01▲ 1.74%ETH$2,388.56▲ 3.10%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.04%BNB$711.99▲ 1.59%XRP$1.31▲ 1.98%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.45▲ 2.79%TRX$0.3183▼ 0.29%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.54%ZEC$1,314.69▲ 1.92%HYPE$81.79▼ 3.27%XMR$118.70▼ 0.73%DOGE$0.0760▲ 1.56%USDS$1.00▼ 0.01%WBT$76.97▲ 2.27%LINK$11.44▲ 2.46%LEO$9.35▲ 0.27%ADA$0.1944▲ 2.54%XLM$0.1641▲ 0.88%BCH$289.10▲ 5.13%NEAR$3.96▼ 1.92%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%USDE$0.9999▲ 0.01%UNI$7.31▼ 0.28%LTC$55.14▲ 0.79%RAIN$0.005875▼ 2.47%CC$0.1002▲ 2.71%AVAX$8.69▼ 0.06%SUI$0.9120▲ 0.92%USD1$0.9993▼ 0.01%XAUT$4,111.82▲ 1.86%GRAM$1.15▼ 2.31%HBAR$0.0714▲ 1.55%QNT$202.29▲ 1.53%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.78%TAO$232.20▲ 1.01%PYUSD$1.0000▼ 0.01%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.02%CRO$0.0515▲ 1.41%

Suckypanther vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 23702.4× the size of Suckypanther (SUCKYP) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.56 across 34 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against SUCKYP's 39%.

Correlation
0.56
Size ratio
1 : 23702.4
SuckypantherSUCKYP

$7.640e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$7,252
Volume 24h
$43
Volatility (ann.)
39%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.172400

24h
-1.24%
Market cap
$171.89M
Volume 24h
$28.95M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
SUCKYP 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

SUCKYPWIF

  1. 7 days-11.62%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-25.15%-32.13%SUCKYP
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.56over 34 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.5690d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricSUCKYPWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-25.1%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.600.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: SUCKYP outperformed WIF by 11.6% — measured on the SUCKYP/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.