SVM Claw vs Unibase

Unibase (UB) is 18541.6× the size of SVM Claw (SVM) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, UB is ahead by 23.6 percentage points (SVM -40.4% against UB -16.8%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.08 across 21 shared trading days). SVM has been the more volatile of the two, at 155% annualised against UB's 101%.

Correlation: 0.08
Size ratio: 1 : 18541.6
Ahead over 30 days: UB

SVM ClawSVM

$1.411e-5

24h: +1.89%
Market cap: $14,115
Volume 24h: $438
Volatility (ann.): 155%

UnibaseUB

$0.104682

24h: -3.43%
Market cap: $261.71M
Volume 24h: $10.58M
Volatility (ann.): 101%

SVM 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% UB

Performance

SVMUB

7 days-35.97%-7.80%UB
30 days-40.41%-16.85%UB

Correlation

0.08over 21 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SVM	UB
Max drawdown (400d)	-47.1%	-31.0%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.26	-0.05

Relative strength over 90 days: UB outperformed SVM by 22.6% — measured on the SVM/UB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

SVM Claw →Unibase →