SWEETS vs BNB
SWEETS ($SWTS) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.17 across 26 shared trading days). Both have run at a similar volatility, around 48% annualised.
- Correlation
- 0.17
$SWTS 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB
Performance
$SWTSBNB
- 7 daysBNB
- 30 daysBNB
- 90 days—
- 1 year—
Correlation
0.17over 26 shared trading days
−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1790d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data
Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.
Risk & extremes
| Metric | $SWTS | BNB |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (400d) | -24.0% | -58.2% |
| Risk-adjusted return (90d) | -0.46 | 0.45 |
| Best 30 days (past year) | — | +29.4% |
| Worst 30 days (past year) | — | -34.9% |
Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed $SWTS by 12.7% — measured on the $SWTS/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.