SyncVault vs LUCA

LUCA (LUCA) is 83.5× the size of SyncVault (SVTS) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SVTS is ahead by 21.5 percentage points (SVTS +6.4% against LUCA -15.1%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.10 across 28 shared trading days). LUCA has been the more volatile of the two, at 50% annualised against SVTS's 41%.

Correlation: 0.10
Size ratio: 1 : 83.5
Ahead over 30 days: SVTS

SyncVaultSVTS

$0.241471

24h: +4.36%
Market cap: $174,019
Volume 24h: $91,076
Volatility (ann.): 41%

LUCALUCA

$0.282140

24h: +2.20%
Market cap: $14.53M
Volume 24h: $449,557
Volatility (ann.): 50%

SVTS 1.2%Share of the two combined market caps98.8% LUCA

Performance

SVTSLUCA

7 days-2.15%-7.81%SVTS
30 days+6.40%-15.05%SVTS

Correlation

0.10over 28 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1090d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SVTS	LUCA
Max drawdown (400d)	-6.7%	-24.3%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	0.16	-0.08

Relative strength over 90 days: LUCA outperformed SVTS by 7.9% — measured on the SVTS/LUCA ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

SyncVault →LUCA →