Talent Protocol vs Ethereum Name Service

Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is 5183.5× the size of Talent Protocol (TALENT) by market capitalisation. Over the past 1 year, ENS is ahead by 38.6 percentage points (TALENT -98.0% against ENS -59.3%). Their daily returns move loosely together (correlation 0.50 across 373 shared trading days). TALENT has been the more volatile of the two, at 101% annualised against ENS's 82%.

Correlation: 0.50
Size ratio: 1 : 5183.5
Ahead over 1 year: ENS

Talent ProtocolTALENT

$0.000134

24h: +0.27%
Market cap: $38,017
Volume 24h: $186
Volatility (ann.): 101%

Ethereum Name ServiceENS

$4.7000

24h: -8.42%
Market cap: $197.06M
Volume 24h: $12.17M
Volatility (ann.): 82%

TALENT 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% ENS

Performance

TALENTENS

7 days-3.37%-3.96%TALENT
30 days-33.98%-25.80%ENS
90 days-32.04%+21.19%ENS
1 year-97.99%-59.35%ENS

Correlation

0.50over 373 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.8190d: 0.581y: 0.50

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	TALENT	ENS
Max drawdown (400d)	-98.4%	-82.4%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.37	0.23
Best 30 days (past year)	+41.9%	+48.0%
Worst 30 days (past year)	-77.0%	-51.6%

Relative strength over 90 days: ENS outperformed TALENT by 44.7% — measured on the TALENT/ENS ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Talent Protocol →Ethereum Name Service →