BTC$80,426.01▲ 3.59%ETH$2,420.43▲ 5.70%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$713.32▲ 2.16%XRP$1.31▲ 2.66%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.77▲ 3.48%TRX$0.3200▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,312.98▲ 5.39%HYPE$83.25▼ 1.29%DOGE$0.0765▲ 2.69%XMR$118.70▼ 0.44%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.86▲ 4.24%LINK$11.51▲ 4.68%LEO$9.35▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1965▲ 3.75%XLM$0.1667▲ 3.14%BCH$280.90▲ 2.98%NEAR$4.01▲ 3.73%UNI$7.57▲ 4.39%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.71▲ 3.21%RAIN$0.005914▼ 5.42%CC$0.1045▲ 6.42%AVAX$8.74▲ 2.34%SUI$0.9217▲ 3.83%USD1$0.9991▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.16▼ 0.70%XAUT$4,098.84▲ 3.15%HBAR$0.0725▲ 4.69%QNT$204.95▲ 5.72%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.91%TAO$233.40▲ 2.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0521▲ 3.59%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%BTC$80,426.01▲ 3.59%ETH$2,420.43▲ 5.70%USDT$0.9994▲ 0.05%BNB$713.32▲ 2.16%XRP$1.31▲ 2.66%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$95.77▲ 3.48%TRX$0.3200▼ 0.48%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.53%ZEC$1,312.98▲ 5.39%HYPE$83.25▼ 1.29%DOGE$0.0765▲ 2.69%XMR$118.70▼ 0.44%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$77.86▲ 4.24%LINK$11.51▲ 4.68%LEO$9.35▲ 0.56%ADA$0.1965▲ 3.75%XLM$0.1667▲ 3.14%BCH$280.90▲ 2.98%NEAR$4.01▲ 3.73%UNI$7.57▲ 4.39%DAI$1.00▲ 0.01%USDE$1.00▲ 0.06%LTC$55.71▲ 3.21%RAIN$0.005914▼ 5.42%CC$0.1045▲ 6.42%AVAX$8.74▲ 2.34%SUI$0.9217▲ 3.83%USD1$0.9991▲ 0.01%GRAM$1.16▼ 0.70%XAUT$4,098.84▲ 3.15%HBAR$0.0725▲ 4.69%QNT$204.95▲ 5.72%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.91%TAO$233.40▲ 2.99%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0521▲ 3.59%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%

Tanox vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 1379.9× the size of Tanox (LTX) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.25 across 35 shared trading days). LTX has been the more volatile of the two, at 292% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.25
Size ratio
1 : 1379.9
TanoxLTX

$1.550e-6

24h
+3.70%
Market cap
$124,252
Volume 24h
$185
Volatility (ann.)
292%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.171100

24h
-1.10%
Market cap
$171.45M
Volume 24h
$30.65M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
LTX 0.1%Share of the two combined market caps99.9% WIF

Performance

LTXWIF

  1. 7 days+32.90%-7.39%LTX
  2. 30 days-74.84%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.25over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.2590d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricLTXWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-85.2%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.260.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed LTX by 62.5% — measured on the LTX/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.