True Performance Network vs lium

lium (SN51) is 39.5× the size of True Performance Network (SN65) by market capitalisation. Over the past 30 days, SN51 is ahead by 22.1 percentage points (SN65 -6.0% against SN51 +16.1%). Their daily returns move very closely together (correlation 0.87 across 23 shared trading days). SN51 has been the more volatile of the two, at 140% annualised against SN65's 107%.

Correlation: 0.87
Size ratio: 1 : 39.5
Ahead over 30 days: SN51

True Performance NetworkSN65

$0.666170

24h: -4.36%
Market cap: $3.40M
Volume 24h: $720,786
Volatility (ann.): 107%

liumSN51

$26.5300

24h: +0.75%
Market cap: $134.43M
Volume 24h: $3.35M
Volatility (ann.): 140%

SN65 2.5%Share of the two combined market caps97.5% SN51

Performance

SN65SN51

7 days-0.65%-13.99%SN65
30 days-5.96%+16.13%SN51

Correlation

0.87over 23 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	SN65	SN51
Max drawdown (400d)	-28.3%	-19.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.06	0.59

Relative strength over 90 days: SN51 outperformed SN65 by 34.1% — measured on the SN65/SN51 ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

True Performance Network →lium →