TaoCats vs Bordrless

TaoCats (CONST) and Bordrless (BORDR) compared side by side. Over the past 30 days, CONST is ahead by 49.8 percentage points (CONST -49.0% against BORDR -98.7%). Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.19 across 20 shared trading days). BORDR has been the more volatile of the two, at 959% annualised against CONST's 290%.

Correlation: 0.19
Ahead over 30 days: CONST

TaoCatsCONST

$4.439e-5

24h: -2.31%
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: $80
Volatility (ann.): 290%

BordrlessBORDR

$2.055e-5

24h: +23.32%
Market cap: $20,548
Volume 24h: $1.10M
Volatility (ann.): 959%

CONST 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BORDR

Performance

CONSTBORDR

7 days-53.22%-16.86%BORDR
30 days-48.98%-98.75%CONST

Correlation

0.19over 20 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: insufficient data90d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	CONST	BORDR
Max drawdown (400d)	-64.5%	-99.8%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.17	-0.10

Relative strength over 90 days: CONST outperformed BORDR by 1271.0% — measured on the CONST/BORDR ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

TaoCats →Bordrless →