BTC$75,995.21▼ 5.27%ETH$2,251.70▼ 7.02%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.01%BNB$688.36▼ 3.69%XRP$1.24▼ 5.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$90.02▼ 6.65%TRX$0.3160▼ 1.14%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.39%ZEC$1,236.90▼ 5.46%HYPE$78.46▼ 8.56%XMR$118.70▼ 4.04%DOGE$0.0717▼ 7.07%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.84%LEO$9.35▲ 0.33%LINK$10.68▼ 7.55%ADA$0.1819▼ 7.80%BCH$278.40▼ 0.32%XLM$0.1536▼ 8.77%NEAR$3.70▼ 10.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$0.9997▼ 0.04%UNI$6.75▼ 11.87%RAIN$0.005686▼ 2.63%LTC$51.66▼ 8.07%CC$0.0932▼ 6.33%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.05%AVAX$8.17▼ 8.38%SUI$0.8494▼ 9.51%XAUT$4,071.40▲ 0.91%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.41%HBAR$0.0674▼ 7.46%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%QNT$191.35▼ 5.92%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000004▼ 6.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$216.50▼ 8.21%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.55%BTC$75,995.21▼ 5.27%ETH$2,251.70▼ 7.02%USDT$0.9993▲ 0.01%BNB$688.36▼ 3.69%XRP$1.24▼ 5.42%USDC$1.00▲ 0.02%SOL$90.02▼ 6.65%TRX$0.3160▼ 1.14%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.39%ZEC$1,236.90▼ 5.46%HYPE$78.46▼ 8.56%XMR$118.70▼ 4.04%DOGE$0.0717▼ 7.07%USDS$1.00▲ 0.02%WBT$73.17▼ 5.84%LEO$9.35▲ 0.33%LINK$10.68▼ 7.55%ADA$0.1819▼ 7.80%BCH$278.40▼ 0.32%XLM$0.1536▼ 8.77%NEAR$3.70▼ 10.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$0.9997▼ 0.04%UNI$6.75▼ 11.87%RAIN$0.005686▼ 2.63%LTC$51.66▼ 8.07%CC$0.0932▼ 6.33%USD1$0.9989▼ 0.05%AVAX$8.17▼ 8.38%SUI$0.8494▼ 9.51%XAUT$4,071.40▲ 0.91%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.41%HBAR$0.0674▼ 7.46%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%QNT$191.35▼ 5.92%PYUSD$1.0000▲ 0.00%SHIB$0.000004▼ 6.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.05%TAO$216.50▼ 8.21%CRO$0.0486▼ 6.55%

The Dancing Squirrel vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 12647.7× the size of The Dancing Squirrel (BELKA) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.22 across 32 shared trading days). WIF has been the more volatile of the two, at 104% annualised against BELKA's 83%.

Correlation
-0.22
Size ratio
1 : 12647.7
The Dancing SquirrelBELKA

$1.269e-5

24h
—
Market cap
$12,679
Volume 24h
$2
Volatility (ann.)
83%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.160200

24h
-10.17%
Market cap
$160.36M
Volume 24h
$28.69M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
BELKA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

BELKAWIF

  1. 7 days-9.37%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-19.57%-32.13%BELKA
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.22over 32 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.2290d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricBELKAWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-20.3%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.210.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: BELKA outperformed WIF by 20.3% — measured on the BELKA/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.