BTC$80,360.02▲ 2.52%ETH$2,415.26▲ 4.17%USDT$0.9996▲ 0.07%BNB$715.18▲ 2.02%XRP$1.32▲ 3.18%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.73▲ 4.10%TRX$0.3188▼ 0.98%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.55%ZEC$1,323.28▲ 3.37%HYPE$83.47▼ 3.24%DOGE$0.0771▲ 2.63%XMR$118.70▼ 0.33%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$77.63▲ 3.15%LINK$11.59▲ 4.35%LEO$9.35▲ 0.36%ADA$0.1993▲ 4.25%XLM$0.1677▲ 2.56%BCH$288.90▲ 4.75%NEAR$4.03▼ 0.42%UNI$7.58▲ 1.87%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.08%RAIN$0.006129▼ 1.20%LTC$56.16▲ 3.01%CC$0.1042▲ 5.30%AVAX$8.77▲ 0.75%SUI$0.9330▲ 2.18%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%XAUT$4,105.59▲ 1.95%GRAM$1.16▼ 2.00%HBAR$0.0730▲ 3.65%QNT$205.35▲ 5.45%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.75%TAO$236.70▲ 3.03%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0523▲ 2.37%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%BTC$80,360.02▲ 2.52%ETH$2,415.26▲ 4.17%USDT$0.9996▲ 0.07%BNB$715.18▲ 2.02%XRP$1.32▲ 3.18%USDC$1.00▲ 0.04%SOL$96.73▲ 4.10%TRX$0.3188▼ 0.98%FIGR_HELOC$1.05▲ 1.55%ZEC$1,323.28▲ 3.37%HYPE$83.47▼ 3.24%DOGE$0.0771▲ 2.63%XMR$118.70▼ 0.33%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$77.63▲ 3.15%LINK$11.59▲ 4.35%LEO$9.35▲ 0.36%ADA$0.1993▲ 4.25%XLM$0.1677▲ 2.56%BCH$288.90▲ 4.75%NEAR$4.03▼ 0.42%UNI$7.58▲ 1.87%DAI$1.00▲ 0.03%USDE$1.00▲ 0.08%RAIN$0.006129▼ 1.20%LTC$56.16▲ 3.01%CC$0.1042▲ 5.30%AVAX$8.77▲ 0.75%SUI$0.9330▲ 2.18%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.06%XAUT$4,105.59▲ 1.95%GRAM$1.16▼ 2.00%HBAR$0.0730▲ 3.65%QNT$205.35▲ 5.45%USDG$1.00▲ 0.03%SHIB$0.000005▲ 1.75%TAO$236.70▲ 3.03%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%CRO$0.0523▲ 2.37%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%

The Little Trencher Who Couldn’t vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 26526.4× the size of The Little Trencher Who Couldn’t (ENGINE) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.18 across 35 shared trading days). ENGINE has been the more volatile of the two, at 310% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.18
Size ratio
1 : 26526.4
The Little Trencher Who Couldn’tENGINE

$6.500e-6

24h
—
Market cap
$6,502
Volume 24h
—
Volatility (ann.)
310%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.172600

24h
-2.28%
Market cap
$172.48M
Volume 24h
$29.12M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
ENGINE 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

ENGINEWIF

  1. 7 days-21.65%-7.39%WIF
  2. 30 days-28.21%-32.13%ENGINE
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

0.18over 35 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.1890d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricENGINEWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-53.8%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.090.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: ENGINE outperformed WIF by 5.8% — measured on the ENGINE/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.