BTC$77,162.04▼ 4.70%ETH$2,295.62▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$695.72▼ 3.70%XRP$1.26▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.07▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3169▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,245.30▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.23▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0729▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.91▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1859▼ 7.29%BCH$281.20▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1577▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.78▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.06▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.10▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.37▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8656▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,090.39▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0687▼ 7.28%QNT$195.01▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$221.00▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%BTC$77,162.04▼ 4.70%ETH$2,295.62▼ 5.99%USDT$0.9995▲ 0.04%BNB$695.72▼ 3.70%XRP$1.26▼ 5.96%USDC$1.00▲ 0.03%SOL$91.07▼ 6.81%TRX$0.3169▼ 0.76%FIGR_HELOC$1.04▲ 1.36%ZEC$1,245.30▼ 8.70%HYPE$79.23▼ 9.91%XMR$118.70▼ 2.58%DOGE$0.0729▼ 6.89%USDS$1.00▲ 0.01%WBT$74.13▼ 4.63%LEO$9.35▲ 0.28%LINK$10.91▼ 7.04%ADA$0.1859▼ 7.29%BCH$281.20▼ 1.24%XLM$0.1577▼ 7.97%NEAR$3.78▼ 11.46%DAI$1.00▲ 0.05%USDE$0.9998▼ 0.01%UNI$7.06▼ 9.31%RAIN$0.005792▼ 6.06%LTC$53.10▼ 6.50%CC$0.0939▼ 6.79%AVAX$8.37▼ 7.93%USD1$0.9994▲ 0.03%SUI$0.8656▼ 9.22%XAUT$4,090.39▲ 1.88%GRAM$1.11▼ 7.56%HBAR$0.0687▼ 7.28%QNT$195.01▼ 6.90%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%PYUSD$1.00▲ 0.01%SHIB$0.000005▼ 5.83%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.03%TAO$221.00▼ 7.81%CRO$0.0498▼ 5.04%

The Runner vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 9912.1× the size of The Runner (SAMBA) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely in opposite directions (correlation -0.03 across 33 shared trading days). SAMBA has been the more volatile of the two, at 362% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
-0.03
Size ratio
1 : 9912.1
The RunnerSAMBA

$1.660e-5

24h
+25.38%
Market cap
$16,595
Volume 24h
$902
Volatility (ann.)
362%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.164300

24h
-9.29%
Market cap
$164.49M
Volume 24h
$28.27M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
SAMBA 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% WIF

Performance

SAMBAWIF

  1. 7 days+3.10%-7.39%SAMBA
  2. 30 days-74.58%-32.13%WIF
  3. 90 days—+21.70%—
  4. 1 year—-57.59%—

Correlation

-0.03over 33 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: -0.0490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricSAMBAWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-79.9%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.200.21
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed SAMBA by 60.8% — measured on the SAMBA/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.