Tipn vs BNB

Tipn (TIPN) and BNB (BNB) compared side by side. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.04 across 31 shared trading days). BNB has been the more volatile of the two, at 51% annualised against TIPN's 38%.

Correlation: 0.04

TipnTIPN

$0.000431

24h: —
Market cap: —
Volume 24h: —
Volatility (ann.): 38%

BNBBNB

$702.5000

24h: +0.73%
Market cap: $92.15B
Volume 24h: $930.62M
Volatility (ann.): 51%

TIPN 0.0%Share of the two combined market caps100.0% BNB

Performance

TIPNBNB

7 days-3.81%-6.28%TIPN
30 days-15.77%-12.23%BNB
90 days—+17.56%—
1 year—-29.73%—

Correlation

0.04over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step

7d: insufficient data30d: 0.0490d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

Metric	TIPN	BNB
Max drawdown (400d)	-17.7%	-58.2%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)	-0.41	0.45
Best 30 days (past year)	—	+29.4%
Worst 30 days (past year)	—	-34.9%

Relative strength over 90 days: BNB outperformed TIPN by 7.5% — measured on the TIPN/BNB ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.

Tipn →BNB →