BTC$78,640.96▲ 1.83%ETH$2,332.99▲ 2.66%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$701.71▲ 0.57%XRP$1.29▲ 2.57%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.84▲ 1.14%TRX$0.3207▼ 0.73%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,313.31▲ 12.08%HYPE$87.00▲ 3.03%XMR$118.70▲ 1.76%DOGE$0.0754▲ 0.95%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$75.47▲ 1.77%LINK$11.19▲ 0.45%LEO$9.32▲ 0.54%ADA$0.1922▲ 1.40%XLM$0.1648▲ 1.11%BCH$277.00▼ 0.23%NEAR$4.12▲ 6.66%UNI$7.51▲ 3.86%USDE$1.00▲ 0.01%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%RAIN$0.006235▲ 0.72%LTC$54.99▲ 0.87%CC$0.0987▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.71▲ 1.83%SUI$0.9166▲ 3.69%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.00%GRAM$1.19▲ 3.26%XAUT$4,034.04▲ 3.27%HBAR$0.0713▲ 2.01%QNT$201.43▲ 1.78%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.48%TAO$231.70▲ 3.21%PYUSD$0.9999▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0514▲ 2.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%BTC$78,640.96▲ 1.83%ETH$2,332.99▲ 2.66%USDT$0.9990▲ 0.03%BNB$701.71▲ 0.57%XRP$1.29▲ 2.57%USDC$1.00▲ 0.01%SOL$93.84▲ 1.14%TRX$0.3207▼ 0.73%FIGR_HELOC$1.03▼ 0.19%ZEC$1,313.31▲ 12.08%HYPE$87.00▲ 3.03%XMR$118.70▲ 1.76%DOGE$0.0754▲ 0.95%USDS$1.00▲ 0.03%WBT$75.47▲ 1.77%LINK$11.19▲ 0.45%LEO$9.32▲ 0.54%ADA$0.1922▲ 1.40%XLM$0.1648▲ 1.11%BCH$277.00▼ 0.23%NEAR$4.12▲ 6.66%UNI$7.51▲ 3.86%USDE$1.00▲ 0.01%DAI$1.00▲ 0.02%RAIN$0.006235▲ 0.72%LTC$54.99▲ 0.87%CC$0.0987▲ 1.57%AVAX$8.71▲ 1.83%SUI$0.9166▲ 3.69%USD1$0.9995▲ 0.00%GRAM$1.19▲ 3.26%XAUT$4,034.04▲ 3.27%HBAR$0.0713▲ 2.01%QNT$201.43▲ 1.78%USDG$1.00▲ 0.02%SHIB$0.000005▲ 2.48%TAO$231.70▲ 3.21%PYUSD$0.9999▲ 0.01%CRO$0.0514▲ 2.34%RLUSD$1.00▲ 0.00%

Tung Tung Tung Sahur vs dogwifhat

dogwifhat (WIF) is 58.2× the size of Tung Tung Tung Sahur (TRIPLET) by market capitalisation. Their daily returns move barely together (correlation 0.31 across 31 shared trading days). TRIPLET has been the more volatile of the two, at 300% annualised against WIF's 104%.

Correlation
0.31
Size ratio
1 : 58.2
Tung Tung Tung SahurTRIPLET

$0.003039

24h
+2.00%
Market cap
$3.04M
Volume 24h
$114,469
Volatility (ann.)
300%
dogwifhatWIF

$0.177300

24h
+3.64%
Market cap
$176.73M
Volume 24h
$24.94M
Volatility (ann.)
104%
TRIPLET 1.7%Share of the two combined market caps98.3% WIF

Performance

TRIPLETWIF

  1. 7 days+10.91%-4.50%TRIPLET
  2. 30 days-20.24%-32.23%TRIPLET
  3. 90 days—+22.16%—
  4. 1 year—-61.00%—

Correlation

0.31over 31 shared trading days

−1 opposite0 unrelated+1 in step
7d: insufficient data30d: 0.3190d: insufficient data1y: insufficient data

Measured on daily returns rather than on prices. Two assets that both simply trend upward score near 1.0 on raw prices whether or not they move together, so returns are what answer the question people mean by correlation.

Risk & extremes

MetricTRIPLETWIF
Max drawdown (400d)-52.5%-83.1%
Risk-adjusted return (90d)-0.070.22
Best 30 days (past year)—+57.5%
Worst 30 days (past year)—-50.5%

Relative strength over 90 days: WIF outperformed TRIPLET by 31.4% — measured on the TRIPLET/WIF ratio, so it holds regardless of market direction.